[Logo]
 
  [Search] Search   [Recent Topics] Recent Topics   [Members]  Member Listing   [Groups] Back to home page 
[Register] Register / 
[Login] Login 
Stat adjustment?  XML
Forum Index -> Fantasy Football
Author Message
Pyramidion

Wicked Sick!
[Avatar]

Joined: 02/21/2005 14:31:28
Messages: 1099
Location: Brick City
Offline

I was looking at the scores from last week and I'm thinking about lowering the WR yrds from 20 to get 1 point, to 10 to get 1 point. I thinking about it because I had a WR go for over 130 yrd and he only got 6 points, compared to one of my running backs who only had 63 yards and received the same 6 points. Any thoughts about this, I won't change anything till I hear back from most everyone.
[Email] aim icon
Jschill



Joined: 07/30/2006 20:13:17
Messages: 29
Offline

i dont care much i am sitten in a pretty good place at the moment lol so what ever the people think.
Fire_eclipse

Godlike
[Avatar]

Joined: 01/24/2005 12:11:23
Messages: 353
Location: Red Lodge, MT
Offline

Yeah what he said ^^^^^

Can take the cold, can take the heat, and can't be beat.
[Email] aim icon [MSN]
PhoenixFire

Killing Spree
[Avatar]
Joined: 04/08/2006 19:19:26
Messages: 58
Location: Beantown
Offline

Hmm, I always thought it was set up like that since it's easier to get yards through the air

I don't mind a lot if you change it, but it'll make WRs much more valuable

Hou ye hui cong shu diao ~ Saru mo ki kara ochiru. ~ Even monkeys fall from trees.
Pyramidion

Wicked Sick!
[Avatar]

Joined: 02/21/2005 14:31:28
Messages: 1099
Location: Brick City
Offline

I'm still thinking, I don't want to make them more valuable than running backs, and this shouldn't do that. As of right now kickers score more points than a good day for a wide receiver. Hmm, maybe I can lower it to 15 yrds per point, that'd make them slightly more improved, but still less than RB's... what do you think?
[Email] aim icon
Fro13

Dominating
[Avatar]

Joined: 04/04/2005 17:36:13
Messages: 210
Location: Spokane, WA
Offline

I think on average WR and RB get about the same yardage per game, but WR usually get less TD's. So, I'd say it would be good to lower the yards for a point down to 10.

[Email]
cplmac

Wicked Sick!
[Avatar]

Joined: 12/19/2004 21:10:38
Messages: 1464
Location: chicago burbs
Offline

Definately lower it to 10. I didn't know it was at 20 or I would have said something before. Otherwise wide receivers are worth less than kickers and tight ends. It's easier to get yards through the air, but unlike the RB position, there are several wide receivers on each team so the yardage gets divied up, plus the tight end. I vote to lower it.

good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
Pyramidion

Wicked Sick!
[Avatar]

Joined: 02/21/2005 14:31:28
Messages: 1099
Location: Brick City
Offline

Ok, so nobody's voted against it so unless anyone feels strongly about lowering it I think I will adjust it to 10. It can always be adjusted so if you disagree or see anything else that's somewhat off be sure to bring it up
[Email] aim icon
 
Forum Index -> Fantasy Football
Go to: